Re: md5 encryption
- From: Andy Hassall <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 19:51:50 +0100
On Fri, 27 May 2005 19:05:55 +0100, "simon" <spambucket@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Sorry, but that's not true.
>As said, it is technically possible to get the original string but near
>impossible to do so.
Well, whilst it's technically possible to get a string that hashes to the same
value (which is generally all you need if it's used as a password), this only
means it _might_ be the original string; it is completely impossible to
determine whether it actually _is_ the original string.
--
Andy Hassall / <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx> / <http://www.andyh.co.uk>
<http://www.andyhsoftware.co.uk/space> Space: disk usage analysis tool
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: simon
- Re: md5 encryption
- References:
- md5 encryption
- From: roger
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: Simon
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: Michael Trausch
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: simon
- md5 encryption
- Prev by Date: Re: md5 encryption
- Next by Date: Re: md5 encryption
- Previous by thread: Re: md5 encryption
- Next by thread: Re: md5 encryption
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|