Re: md5 encryption
- From: "simon" <spambucket@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 20:04:41 +0100
>>Sorry, but that's not true.
>>As said, it is technically possible to get the original string but near
>>impossible to do so.
>
> Well, whilst it's technically possible to get a string that hashes to the
> same
> value (which is generally all you need if it's used as a password), this
> only
> means it _might_ be the original string; it is completely impossible to
> determine whether it actually _is_ the original string.
>
Of course, but seen that almost every application out there only compare the
hash it doesn't really matter.
And all I was trying to do was to correct the statement that md5 was a one
way hash.
Simon
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: Michael Trausch
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: Oli Filth
- Re: md5 encryption
- References:
- md5 encryption
- From: roger
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: Simon
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: Michael Trausch
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: simon
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: Andy Hassall
- md5 encryption
- Prev by Date: Re: md5 encryption
- Next by Date: Re: md5 encryption
- Previous by thread: Re: md5 encryption
- Next by thread: Re: md5 encryption
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|