Re: md5 encryption
- From: Oli Filth <catch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 19:17:32 GMT
simon said the following on 27/05/2005 20:04:
Sorry, but that's not true. As said, it is technically possible to get the original string but near impossible to do so.
Well, whilst it's technically possible to get a string that hashes to the same
value (which is generally all you need if it's used as a password), this only
means it _might_ be the original string; it is completely impossible to
determine whether it actually _is_ the original string.
And all I was trying to do was to correct the statement that md5 was a one way hash.
It is one-way, in that it's a many-to-one mapping.
Start with a given string, it will always map to the same hash. Start with the hash, it could map to any one of an infinite number of strings.
-- Oli .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: simon
- Re: md5 encryption
- References:
- md5 encryption
- From: roger
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: Simon
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: Michael Trausch
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: simon
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: Andy Hassall
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: simon
- md5 encryption
- Prev by Date: Re: md5 encryption
- Next by Date: Re: md5 encryption
- Previous by thread: Re: md5 encryption
- Next by thread: Re: md5 encryption
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|