Re: md5 encryption
- From: "simon" <spambucket@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 14:00:42 +0100
>>
>> And all I was trying to do was to correct the statement that md5 was a
>> one
>> way hash.
>>
>
> It is a one way hash function.
I am sorry, but I don't quite agree.
I did, (and still do), some reading, the fact is that you can get a string
given a hash key.
Please note that I was, (maybe wrongly), talking about passwords.
Every application compares the key and not the string.
>
> - Mike
Simon
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: Geoff Berrow
- Re: md5 encryption
- References:
- md5 encryption
- From: roger
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: Simon
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: Michael Trausch
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: simon
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: Andy Hassall
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: simon
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: Michael Trausch
- md5 encryption
- Prev by Date: Re: md5 encryption
- Next by Date: Re: Is this possible easily?
- Previous by thread: Re: md5 encryption
- Next by thread: Re: md5 encryption
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|