Re: md5 encryption
- From: Michael Trausch <fd0man+spam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 08:20:47 -0400
simon wrote:
>
> Of course, but seen that almost every application out there only compare the
> hash it doesn't really matter.
>
> And all I was trying to do was to correct the statement that md5 was a one
> way hash.
>
It is a one way hash function.
Read it's documentation.
Nobody said that one-way hash functions were free of collisions,
however. The fact is, it *IS* a one way hash function. Like any one of
them, there will be collisions present. Please, do some reading.
- Mike
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: simon
- Re: md5 encryption
- References:
- md5 encryption
- From: roger
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: Simon
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: Michael Trausch
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: simon
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: Andy Hassall
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: simon
- md5 encryption
- Prev by Date: Re: md5 encryption
- Next by Date: Re: md5 encryption
- Previous by thread: Re: md5 encryption
- Next by thread: Re: md5 encryption
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|