Re: md5 encryption
- From: Geoff Berrow <blthecat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 15:59:09 +0100
I noticed that Message-ID: <3fr8cfF979vlU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from simon
contained the following:
>> It is a one way hash function.
>
>I am sorry, but I don't quite agree.
>I did, (and still do), some reading, the fact is that you can get a string
>given a hash key.
Not with any certainty, especially if the password is a random string of
characters. Any number of strings could produce the same hash.
>
>Please note that I was, (maybe wrongly), talking about passwords.
>Every application compares the key and not the string.
But the OP wanted to know if you could get the original string from the
hash. And, effectively, you can't.
--
Geoff Berrow 0110001001101100010000000110
001101101011011001000110111101100111001011
100110001101101111001011100111010101101011
.
- References:
- md5 encryption
- From: roger
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: Simon
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: Michael Trausch
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: simon
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: Andy Hassall
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: simon
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: Michael Trausch
- Re: md5 encryption
- From: simon
- md5 encryption
- Prev by Date: Re: Is this possible easily?
- Next by Date: chmod()
- Previous by thread: Re: md5 encryption
- Next by thread: Re: md5 encryption
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|