Re: Time Out an Exec Call

In message <g86fg.22$OH7.1@xxxxxxxx>, robert <ab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
"Martin Jay" <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5xfyYzDXiMfEFwWM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| In message <Oe1fg.5$im3.0@xxxxxxxx>, robert <ab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| writes

| >i didn't top-post

| Yes you did, ...

<snip>

i hit reply group...perhaps you need to read the rfc re. non-synchronous
communications in which case there is no guarantee about the arrival time of
any message. i have neither replied out of turn, out of date, or any other
kind of foul muck of which you are acusing.

You top-posted. You're making yourself look foolish by trying to justify it. Top-posting has nothing to do with the date your message was written or sent.

i also know what sic means...and am fairly certain at seeing how you use it
that you incorrectly use it as "spell it correctly". as i've said before, it
suffices to use quotes when quoting someone or accurately paraphrase...no
sic needed.

I use "sic" when I feel that it's needed. And I'm fully aware of what it means, and when and how to use it.

now, *** off and die. when i flame you, it is because you've posted useless
drivel. it seems all you can do is find a stretch of a reason to flame me.
i'll make a mistake sometime. wait for that as an oportunity to rare your
fangs...till then, you only look like a troll...and less than bright.

Does that mean we can now call a truce? Will you stop the name calling and using terms such as "*** off and die" now?

I have no interesting in swapping flames with you. As we've demonstrated I make mistakes and you make mistakes too. And when it comes to programming there will always be other ways, or better ways, do achieve an aim.

Pointing these things out and discussing them in a polite way is a good thing because it increases our knowledge and understand.

But name calling and telling someone to "*** off and die" have no place here.
--
Martin Jay
Phone/SMS: +44 7740 191877
Fax: +44 870 915 2124
.

Quantcast