Re: Watermarking with GD, but a bit different....
- From: Danny Boy <snipsnapsnut@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 20:14:50 +0100
Steve wrote:
hmmmm...doesn't that mean you won't see anything? ;^)
Ack... I meant in some parts of the image. "100%" as in "not translucent - but completely transparent" in these parts. Sorry.
"He then selects the frame he like to have the artwork in. All various
frames are also color images, but with a white canvas."
must have been the 7 (or so) times you mentioned 'frames'. ;^)
Well, I should have understood that that would be misunderstood. I didn't mean html frames, but images of frames as in "frames around paintings". ;-)
Cheers,
Danny
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Watermarking with GD, but a bit different....
- From: Danny Boy
- Re: Watermarking with GD, but a bit different....
- From: Steve
- Re: Watermarking with GD, but a bit different....
- From: Danny Boy
- Re: Watermarking with GD, but a bit different....
- From: Steve
- Watermarking with GD, but a bit different....
- Prev by Date: Re: Watermarking with GD, but a bit different....
- Next by Date: Re: Watermarking with GD, but a bit different....
- Previous by thread: Re: Watermarking with GD, but a bit different....
- Next by thread: Re: Watermarking with GD, but a bit different....
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|