Re: about structure.
- From: "Kentor" <kentor@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 19 Dec 2006 13:48:22 -0800
Hrmmm... hehe this is also a good idea and I guess this would be easier
for me to use at the moment... but in the long run, it would prolly
still be better to use a database...
Geoff Berrow wrote:
Message-ID: <1166535755.164051.45680@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from
Kentor contained the following:
I can't include them because they are all different altho similar.... I
can't include the area alone because there's code after and before the
area that is different in each part. Take a look at the examples I
gave...
You are going to have to bite the bullet and rationalise your code. The
database idea is good but if the data does not change you may simply be
better of storing the basic data in an array which you then incorporate
using include(). Your various select boxes can then be generated from
that array.
--
Geoff Berrow 0110001001101100010000000110
001101101011011001000110111101100111001011
100110001101101111001011100111010101101011
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: about structure.
- From: Geoff Berrow
- Re: about structure.
- References:
- about structure.
- From: Kentor
- Re: about structure.
- From: J.O. Aho
- Re: about structure.
- From: Kentor
- Re: about structure.
- From: Geoff Berrow
- about structure.
- Prev by Date: Re: about structure.
- Next by Date: Re: tell a friend - prevent spam
- Previous by thread: Re: about structure.
- Next by thread: Re: about structure.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|