Re: trouble moving existing site having "self-contained" Pear packages defined within it
- From: "Paul" <lof@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:51:49 -0700
"Steve" <no.one@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:SLyOh.675$Zf5.82@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Paul" <lof@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:7WxOh.28213$68.27367@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
btw, don't top-post. had i seen that, i'd have never responded! if you're
about to say 'oh, my computer's clock is just off', i'll respond
'"dumbass"
still applies'.
I honestly don't know what top-post means so I did not do it intentionally.
What does top-post mean?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: trouble moving existing site having "self-contained" Pear packages defined within it
- Next by Date: Re: trouble moving existing site having "self-contained" Pear packages defined within it
- Previous by thread: Re: trouble moving existing site having "self-contained" Pear packages defined within it
- Next by thread: Re: trouble moving existing site having "self-contained" Pear packages defined within it
- Index(es):