Re: Apache vs IIS

Hi
"J.O. Aho" <user@xxxxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
news:62rcg9F23tji5U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
eclipsme wrote:
Lars wrote:

Apache vs IIS? I haven't got ASP.NET to work on Apache niether on my
Windows Server not on my Linux Server so there for I would chose IIS.
Not that Apache is bad but ASP.NET is far easier and faster to create
good web forms in.
IIS is designed for ASP, or rather visa versa. I don't think you can run
asp on Apache, but I could be wrong.

You can run asp on Apache server, and you can do that even on an Apache
running on a Linux server. It's a bit more tricky to install Apache+asp on
Linux than iis+asp on microsoft.


I am just hoping somebody can say "look here" for the differences in
running php from IIS vs Apache. I guess it won't be so easy, though...

It's easier to say what could be wrong if seen the code and your iis
settings.

PHP on a IIS server is rather easy to run once you install PHP on a PC but
if you only use PHP why not use Apache for Windows. If you plan to use IIS
then I ASP.NET and a database on the homepage then IIS is a good suggestion.
I haven't tried PHP on IIS since I can use ASP.NET. The old version of ASP
is pretty similar to PHP. As I recall the use of PHP started to grow when
ASP was introduces. The syntax of the two languages is different. With
ASP.NET not only do you write C# or VB script for your homepages you can
also add WebControls as you can't do with PHP. When you use PHP you have to
check $_GET, $_POST or $_SESSION arrays for fetching user data. ASP.NET is
more used as a WISYWIG tool. Add a control let's say a button for a form to
the aspx page then double click the button and you end up where you can
write the code.

Lars



--

//Aho


.

Quantcast