Re: Apache vs IIS
- From: "Lars" <jon.doe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 13:40:07 GMT
"Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
news:BPadnd-tbPk-qVbanZ2dnUVZ_vCknZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Lars wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
news:AtOdnWceDePSWFXanZ2dnUVZ_jGdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Lars wrote:
HiI've done some ASP.NET. Thanks anyway. I'll stick with PHP and Apache
"J.O. Aho" <user@xxxxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
news:62rcg9F23tji5U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
eclipsme wrote:PHP on a IIS server is rather easy to run once you install PHP on a PC
Lars wrote:You can run asp on Apache server, and you can do that even on an
Apache vs IIS? I haven't got ASP.NET to work on Apache niether on myIIS is designed for ASP, or rather visa versa. I don't think you can
Windows Server not on my Linux Server so there for I would chose
IIS. Not that Apache is bad but ASP.NET is far easier and faster to
create good web forms in.
run asp on Apache, but I could be wrong.
Apache running on a Linux server. It's a bit more tricky to install
Apache+asp on Linux than iis+asp on microsoft.
I am just hoping somebody can say "look here" for the differences inIt's easier to say what could be wrong if seen the code and your iis
running php from IIS vs Apache. I guess it won't be so easy,
though...
settings.
but if you only use PHP why not use Apache for Windows. If you plan to
use IIS then I ASP.NET and a database on the homepage then IIS is a
good suggestion. I haven't tried PHP on IIS since I can use ASP.NET.
The old version of ASP is pretty similar to PHP. As I recall the use of
PHP started to grow when ASP was introduces. The syntax of the two
languages is different. With ASP.NET not only do you write C# or VB
script for your homepages you can also add WebControls as you can't do
with PHP. When you use PHP you have to check $_GET, $_POST or $_SESSION
arrays for fetching user data. ASP.NET is more used as a WISYWIG tool.
Add a control let's say a button for a form to the aspx page then
double click the button and you end up where you can write the code.
Lars
--
//Aho
on Linux. Cheaper and more efficient use of system resources. ASP.NET
is a huge resource hog - like all MS products.
Well that's as good reason as any one. Yes ASP.NET takes some system
resources. But if you design a large system the monley spend in time
saving is greater than what you save to run the system on a cheaper
machine.
There is one MS product I DON'T like and that's The MS Antispyware
Program. It removes all spyware except the biggest spyware of them all
"MSN Serach and WIndows Messanger". MS Antispyware program where probably
only written and released to get rid of all competition for Microsoft MSN
Search.
When it comes to programming tools I like Borlands tools better. As you
might know Delphi is also available for Linux under the name Kylix.
Lars
Let's take two similar VPS's I have. One is Windows - it has 512MB of RAM
(which is exceeded rather regularly, requiring paging) and a 10GB hard
drive (of which > 6GB is used before even loading the web sites).
The other is running on Debian Linux, with 128Mb RAM (exceeded
occasionally) and 5GB hard drive (about 2.3 GB used before loading web
sites).
Processors are similar on the systems, and the sites get about the same
percentage of load. Both have similar sites with similar requirements and
load. One is mostly ASP, the other entirely PHP. And both run similarly
quickly, although the Windows box typically runs a higher CPU percentage
than the Unix one does.
And before someone comments on the fact these are vps's - I also have test
systems set up on dedicated servers for development. The results there
are similar to that on the VPS's, although of course I have to simulate
loads, since they aren't directly on the internet.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
==================
From what I have read and been told ASP.NET has the ability to tell how tomanage SESSION cockies for a particular site. I know you can set this up in
Apache but I recall that is for the entire webserver. By using SESSION
cockies in ASP.NET you can save a lot of processing on the server. For
example when you make a PostBack for a page and want to set some date to
change the view you should not redownload the date from the database again.
This can be set up in the web.config file. As I understand not all PostBacks
has to go via the server. I haven't got the hang of it yet. I've only
programmed ASP.NET for a month 2-4 hours a day. But so far I'm very
satisfied how easy it is to build web based database systems with ASP.NET.
What's a VPS? Obvioulsy some thing common that I recall as soon as some one
explains.
Lars
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Apache vs IIS
- From: J.O. Aho
- Re: Apache vs IIS
- From: Jerry Stuckle
- Re: Apache vs IIS
- References:
- Re: Apache vs IIS
- From: Lars
- Re: Apache vs IIS
- From: Jerry Stuckle
- Re: Apache vs IIS
- From: Lars
- Re: Apache vs IIS
- From: Jerry Stuckle
- Re: Apache vs IIS
- Prev by Date: Re: Apache vs IIS
- Next by Date: Re: Apache vs IIS
- Previous by thread: Re: Apache vs IIS
- Next by thread: Re: Apache vs IIS
- Index(es):