Re: Test pls ignore
- From: "Jessica Griego" <jess@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:24:06 -0600
"Erwin Moller"
<Since_humans_read_this_I_am_spammed_too_much@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:4924277b$0$185$e4fe514c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Jessica Griego schreef:
"Dave" <davenNOSPAMmanvel@hotmailNOSPAMdotcom> wrote in message
news:ca170$4921f3d3$19511@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
ignore
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
Dave,
There are newsgroups that exist ENTIRELY for you to test with. Please use
them instead of annoying the newsgroups you intend to use, which is less
likely to get you plonked before you even post a 'real' message.
Your signal to noise ratio is nearing 1 ... which is the idiot's plane of
existence. Please increase the signal and reduce the noise.
Hi Jessica,
Just curious.
I could be wrong, but signal to noise ratio:
ratio = (Power signal)/(Power noise)
So isn't his signal to noise ratio extremely small instead of nearing 1?
Yes, Erwin, that's the typical math involved. Less noise means clearer
signal. 'Nearing' does not indicate from which direction the approach began,
only that a weaker signal was being reached...a value of 1.
500 / 500 == 1
500 / 200 == 2.5
500 / 100 == 5
Notice the noise is reduced and the signal throughput has increased. I'm not
sure where you're going with this though. I have to agree, "his signal to
noise ratio *is* extremely small". If you believe it is less than 1, you are
saying the amount of noise is greater than the signal. Again, I have to
agree. :)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Test pls ignore
- From: Erwin Moller
- Re: Test pls ignore
- From: FutureShock
- Re: Test pls ignore
- References:
- Test pls ignore
- From: Dave
- Re: Test pls ignore
- From: Jessica Griego
- Re: Test pls ignore
- From: Erwin Moller
- Test pls ignore
- Prev by Date: Re: mt_rand question
- Next by Date: Re: Test pls ignore
- Previous by thread: Re: Test pls ignore
- Next by thread: Re: Test pls ignore
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|