Re: Test pls ignore
- From: Erwin Moller <Since_humans_read_this_I_am_spammed_too_much@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:49:39 +0100
Jessica Griego schreef:
"Erwin Moller" <Since_humans_read_this_I_am_spammed_too_much@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:4924277b$0$185$e4fe514c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxJessica Griego schreef:"Dave" <davenNOSPAMmanvel@hotmailNOSPAMdotcom> wrote in message news:ca170$4921f3d3$19511@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxHi Jessica,ignoreDave,
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
There are newsgroups that exist ENTIRELY for you to test with. Please use them instead of annoying the newsgroups you intend to use, which is less likely to get you plonked before you even post a 'real' message.
Your signal to noise ratio is nearing 1 ... which is the idiot's plane of existence. Please increase the signal and reduce the noise.
Just curious.
I could be wrong, but signal to noise ratio:
ratio = (Power signal)/(Power noise)
So isn't his signal to noise ratio extremely small instead of nearing 1?
Yes, Erwin, that's the typical math involved. Less noise means clearer signal. 'Nearing' does not indicate from which direction the approach began, only that a weaker signal was being reached...a value of 1.
500 / 500 == 1
500 / 200 == 2.5
500 / 100 == 5
Aha, like that.
He was coming from a good ratio, and now he is dropping to 1.
But I am afraid I am getting waaaaaay of topic here. ;-)
Regards,
Erwin Moller
Notice the noise is reduced and the signal throughput has increased. I'm not sure where you're going with this though. I have to agree, "his signal to noise ratio *is* extremely small". If you believe it is less than 1, you are saying the amount of noise is greater than the signal. Again, I have to agree. :)
--
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult."
-- C.A.R. Hoare
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Test pls ignore
- From: +mrcakey
- Re: Test pls ignore
- References:
- Test pls ignore
- From: Dave
- Re: Test pls ignore
- From: Jessica Griego
- Re: Test pls ignore
- From: Erwin Moller
- Re: Test pls ignore
- From: Jessica Griego
- Test pls ignore
- Prev by Date: Re: Test pls ignore
- Next by Date: Re: Test pls ignore
- Previous by thread: Re: Test pls ignore
- Next by thread: Re: Test pls ignore
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|