Re: Test pls ignore

"Erwin Moller"
<Since_humans_read_this_I_am_spammed_too_much@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:492532ad$0$190$e4fe514c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Jessica Griego schreef:
"Erwin Moller"
<Since_humans_read_this_I_am_spammed_too_much@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:4924277b$0$185$e4fe514c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Jessica Griego schreef:
"Dave" <davenNOSPAMmanvel@hotmailNOSPAMdotcom> wrote in message
news:ca170$4921f3d3$19511@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
ignore
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
Dave,

There are newsgroups that exist ENTIRELY for you to test with. Please
use them instead of annoying the newsgroups you intend to use, which is
less likely to get you plonked before you even post a 'real' message.

Your signal to noise ratio is nearing 1 ... which is the idiot's plane
of existence. Please increase the signal and reduce the noise.
Hi Jessica,

Just curious.
I could be wrong, but signal to noise ratio:
ratio = (Power signal)/(Power noise)

So isn't his signal to noise ratio extremely small instead of nearing 1?

Yes, Erwin, that's the typical math involved. Less noise means clearer
signal. 'Nearing' does not indicate from which direction the approach
began, only that a weaker signal was being reached...a value of 1.

500 / 500 == 1
500 / 200 == 2.5
500 / 100 == 5

Aha, like that.
He was coming from a good ratio, and now he is dropping to 1.

But I am afraid I am getting waaaaaay of topic here. ;-)

Regards,
Erwin Moller


Notice the noise is reduced and the signal throughput has increased. I'm
not sure where you're going with this though. I have to agree, "his
signal to noise ratio *is* extremely small". If you believe it is less
than 1, you are saying the amount of noise is greater than the signal.
Again, I have to agree. :)

I sure am glad the OP isn't filling up the group with any more pointless
postings... ;-)

+mrcakey


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Test pls ignore
    ... "Erwin Moller" ... There are newsgroups that exist ENTIRELY for you to test with. ... Your signal to noise ratio is nearing 1 ... ... Please increase the signal and reduce the noise. ...
    (alt.php)
  • Re: Test pls ignore
    ... Jessica Griego wrote: ... Please use them instead of annoying the newsgroups you intend to use, which is less likely to get you plonked before you even post a 'real' message. ... Your signal to noise ratio is nearing 1 ... ... Please increase the signal and reduce the noise. ...
    (alt.php)
  • Re: Test pls ignore
    ... Please use them instead of annoying the newsgroups you intend to use, which is less likely to get you plonked before you even post a 'real' message. ... Your signal to noise ratio is nearing 1 ... ... Please increase the signal and reduce the noise. ...
    (alt.php)
  • Re: Signal to Noise Ratio
    ... the signal to noise ratio of Iain Church's cathode follower pre-amp is still ... The noise residual was mostly hum, ... a Quad Mk2 has a voltage gain of 7.1 times when set to 8 ohms load. ...
    (rec.audio.tubes)
  • Re: Test pls ignore
    ... Erwin Moller wrote: ... Please use them instead of annoying the newsgroups you intend to use, which is less likely to get you plonked before you even post a 'real' message. ... Your signal to noise ratio is nearing 1 ... ... Please increase the signal and reduce the noise. ...
    (alt.php)