Re: ASP.NET VS PHP OOP
From: Hayden Kirk (spam_at_spam.com)
Date: 04/02/04
- Next message: Andy Hassall: "Re: New PHP 4.3.5"
- Previous message: Hayden Kirk: "Re: New PHP 4.3.5"
- In reply to: Savut: "ASP.NET VS PHP OOP"
- Next in thread: Chung Leong: "Re: ASP.NET VS PHP OOP"
- Reply: Chung Leong: "Re: ASP.NET VS PHP OOP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 11:34:58 +1200
Also,
I would say that article would be very biased as well, coming from Oracle.
Not that I have read it, but i've read things like this in the past.
Thanks
Hayden Kirk
"Savut" <webki@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:X3Yac.138$%41.5322@news20.bellglobal.com...
> I know there is a lot o people asking me if PHP5 is fully OOP, I said no,
> but nobody trust me and I dont care as I have no time to explain you all.
> But I find this from ORACLE and so I decided to post it to prove what I
> said. ASP.NET is OOP not PHP (not yet).
>
> http://otn.oracle.com/pub/articles/hull_asp.html
>
> I program 80% of my projects in php, so dont tell me I'm a MS ASP lover,
but
> what I want to said is we have to admit PHP is not enough mature yet, and
> still lack in OOP, and this is so important for programmer, because It
just
> make not sense that this is almost the last language not yet OOP. Can you
> imagine how many programmers we loss just because of it.
>
> Savut
>
- Next message: Andy Hassall: "Re: New PHP 4.3.5"
- Previous message: Hayden Kirk: "Re: New PHP 4.3.5"
- In reply to: Savut: "ASP.NET VS PHP OOP"
- Next in thread: Chung Leong: "Re: ASP.NET VS PHP OOP"
- Reply: Chung Leong: "Re: ASP.NET VS PHP OOP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|