Re: What do you think about Ruby on Rails?
- From: Dikkie Dik <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 08:44:57 +0100
I only once saw somebody using it and demonstrating it.
- The fact that it relies heavily on conventions could be a real drawback if you want to get existing applications (with existing databases) on rails. But not an unsolvable problem, I think.
- The fact that unit tests are built in makes it the first _serious_ development framework I know. I'm glad to get rid of the feeling that I am the only one who knows what unit tests are.
- As a complete ruby novice, it was a bit hard to follow. I think the conventions will require much learning and it will take some time before you know where you can insert your own code. I think it _looks_ easy. It may suffer from an "ASP" like appearance: it can look like childplay, but it still requires a real programmer.
- My impression: a good package to know, even if you are not a ruby programmer. You can learn enough from the ideas behind it.
Best regards.
Matias wrote:
I'm not asking if it's better or not than php... I want to know the opinions of web developers about this new toy...
Byee..
.
- References:
- What do you think about Ruby on Rails?
- From: Matias
- What do you think about Ruby on Rails?
- Prev by Date: Re: Changes to php.ini not being read through
- Next by Date: Re: mktime fails for pre 1970 on Fedora 3
- Previous by thread: What do you think about Ruby on Rails?
- Next by thread: Re: What do you think about Ruby on Rails?
- Index(es):