Re: Concatenate, conjoin, meld, extract images
- From: Geoff Berrow <blthecat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 07:39:22 +0100
Message-ID: <En1Xf.116050$g47.74773@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from Jim
Carlock contained the following:
Anyways, I'm taking a look at the emboss items there and I noticed
the server took a little time in delivering the content. It took about one
to two seconds to get the image to me. Don't know if that helps you
at all, but perhaps you know the processor does the processing?
Curious minds want to know. I'm not going to say that I think there's
a 286 handling the delivery, but would you know?
Well, since I wrote the script, yes I would know. <g>
The image is generated on the fly, pixel by pixel, by comparing two
images. The second image has to be resized first. That's partly what
takes the time, the server is fast enough.
Have more fun here,
http://www.ckdog.co.uk/watermark
--
Geoff Berrow (put thecat out to email)
It's only Usenet, no one dies.
My opinions, not the committee's, mine.
Simple RFDs http://www.ckdog.co.uk/rfdmaker/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Concatenate, conjoin, meld, extract images
- From: Jim Carlock
- Re: Concatenate, conjoin, meld, extract images
- References:
- Concatenate, conjoin, meld, extract images
- From: Jim Carlock
- Re: Concatenate, conjoin, meld, extract images
- From: Geoff Berrow
- Re: Concatenate, conjoin, meld, extract images
- From: Jim Carlock
- Concatenate, conjoin, meld, extract images
- Prev by Date: Re: Avoiding timeout while mass mailing
- Next by Date: Re: array problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Concatenate, conjoin, meld, extract images
- Next by thread: Re: Concatenate, conjoin, meld, extract images
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|