Re: MySQL Speed
- From: "bobzimuta" <ejmalone@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Apr 2006 15:35:24 -0700
Ridge Burner wrote:
Can someone tell me which of these 2 SQL queries will be more efficient? I'm
having a debate with another guy about which would be less resource
intensive for MySQL.
The first uses MySQL to pick a random row in a single statement:
<?php
$sql = "SELECT FROM myTable ORDER BY RAND() LIMIT 1";
$query = mysql_query($sql,$conn);
?>
The second does the same thing, but uses 2 queries to do it:
<?php
$sqlA = "SELECT COUNT(id) FROM myTable";
$queryA = mysql_query($sqlA,$conn);
$num = mysql_result($queryA,0,0);
$random = rand(1,$num);
$sqlB = "SELECT FROM myTable WHERE id='" . $random . "' LIMIT 1";
?>
Basically, which approach would be better to use in a high traffic
environment to retrieve a single random row?
Thanks for any help/advice you can give!
ps. the code may not be 100% correct, it is for demonstration purposes only!
MySQL creates an internal counter for the number of rows in a table (at
least MyISAM as far as I know). So doing "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM table"
is instant. So as far as I know, using the COUNT(*) should be faster,
as long as id is a unique (or primary) key. If in doubt, use the
EXPLAIN syntax to see how many rows are being queried for the two
different queries. Hope that helps.
.
- References:
- MySQL Speed
- From: Ridge Burner
- MySQL Speed
- Prev by Date: Re: Line Breaks in a Textarea
- Next by Date: Re: Line Breaks in a Textarea
- Previous by thread: Re: MySQL Speed
- Next by thread: NEWBIE: Connecting to file server
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|