Re: htm vs. php problem
- From: Ivan Marsh <annoyed@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 10:44:19 -0600
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 16:38:10 +0100, Michael Fesser wrote:
.oO(Ivan Marsh)
The only thing to tell them is that processing .htm files as anything
other than HTML files is simply not right.
Having .htm(l), .php and maybe even more extensions in the URLs on the
same site is not right either.
What other purpose do file extensions serve other than to identify the
content of the file and how it should be processed?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: htm vs. php problem
- From: Petr Vileta
- Re: htm vs. php problem
- From: John Dunlop
- Re: htm vs. php problem
- References:
- htm vs. php problem
- From: Andrew
- Re: htm vs. php problem
- From: Andrew
- Re: htm vs. php problem
- From: Peter Fox
- Re: htm vs. php problem
- From: Ivan Marsh
- Re: htm vs. php problem
- From: Peter Fox
- Re: htm vs. php problem
- From: Ivan Marsh
- Re: htm vs. php problem
- From: Michael Fesser
- htm vs. php problem
- Prev by Date: Re: htm vs. php problem
- Next by Date: Re: htm vs. php problem
- Previous by thread: Re: htm vs. php problem
- Next by thread: Re: htm vs. php problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|