Re: Grayscaling images causes mangled image + segfault

On Apr 17, 9:19 am, "Steve" <no....@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"comp.lang.php" <phillip.s.pow...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:1176815139.873085.251640@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| On Apr 17, 1:26 am, "Steve" <no....@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| > "comp.lang.php" <phillip.s.pow...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| >
| >news:1176787021.483679.30120@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | On Apr 16, 4:37 pm, Jerry Stuckle <jstuck...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:| >Steve wrote:

| >
| > | >
| > | > <snip garbage>
| > | >
| > | > I found your tone to be arrogant and condescending, whether he was
the
| > | > author of the class or not.
| > | >
| > | > And as I said before - alt.anal.orifices is thataway ===>
| > |
| > | Thanx Jerry for your help! Turns out that the simple process of having
| > | class properties that I forgot to include fixed everything (*ahem*)
| >
| > now on to fix the other problems noted, right? of course not. have you
| > benchmarked your performance against imagecopygrayscale? of course not.
will
| > you? probably. will you post the dire results back here...of course not.
| >
| > keep slinging that code phil.
|
| Thanx, I will! And I appreciate all of your help!

hey, no problem. you are single-handedly increasing my paygrade. companies
that have a go with you and those of your prowess soon learn that quality
has a much higher price tag. so, i thank you very much. :)

Don't thank me. Thank yourself for openly and publically
demonstrating your inability to interact with others which lowers your
pricetag to the deservedably low level of $0.00

Can't wait to see HR do a keyword search on "dimwit" and "brain-dead"!

.

Relevant Pages