Re: Finding MAC Address

On May 26, 2:59 am, Ravi <Ravindrayep...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ok people my assumption was wrong... Matt can u tell me how u decode
it because i tryied but base64_decode() function is showing nothing. i
used codelock software for this. But now i don't want to use it any
more i wnat to do it myself with a fresh logic...

any suggestion or help to do it....

Ravi

You can decode it with any base64 decoder. Try the one at
http://www.opinionatedgeek.com/dotnet/tools/Base64Decode/ for
example.

I can't stress enough how much you should listen to what the other
posters are saying. The problem isn't the *software* that you are
using to obfuscate your code. The problem is that this is not a good
design for securing an application. Code obfuscation is only a way to
make it harder for people to figure out your code, but it won't stop a
talented hacker. It might not even stop a novice hacker. In fact, it
will probably encourage them to explore your code further.

So, don't try to obfuscate, hide or encrypt the code for security
purposes. Rather, use established security mechanisms that properly
authenticate users or systems. Mechanisms such as passwords and
certificates, when used properly, are wonderful means to accomplish
this.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: protect my code
    ... You can easily download .net decompilers and then look at ... A company that sells security ... It takes administor rights to run it, it eats all memory and tells you 'sorry, we couldn't obfuscate foo.exe' or, when it does 'obfuscate', it leaves everything intact but adds some volume to the file. ... For people working with the Visual Studio Standard Edition, is there a file 'dotfuscator.exe' somewhere in the SDK? ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
  • Xenocode and 0xc000007b
    ... I use XenoCode to obfuscate. ... Yesterday I installed the VS2005 Security ... Update and some Outlook patches and now when I run XC, ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.compactframework)
  • Re: Possible New Security Tool For FreeBSD, Need Your Help.
    ... > Why not require the incoming packets to be spoofed from a preordained set ... > of IP addresses to obfuscate it even more. ... Obfuscation isn't security, it is the illusion of it. ...
    (FreeBSD-Security)