Re: I FOUND IT!

On 27 Jul, 15:16, Webrickco <webric...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 27, 3:10 pm, Captain Paralytic <paul_laut...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On 27 Jul, 15:01, Webrickco <webric...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jul 27, 9:51 am, Captain Paralytic <paul_laut...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 26 Jul, 22:19, tomb <t...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Thank you to all who have tried to help me, sorry to have bothered all
of you. I just found that by generating values for all my text boxes in
the php code, the reset button has no effect. I guess this was actually
an HTML issue, like Rik said.

Tom

Rik and I were both trying to tell you where you needed to go to get
the answer and all you would do in your arrogance was moan that the
advice wasn't what you wanted.

I think an apology to Rik would be nice.

Next time someone is asking a question in a forum or a groups, you
have 2 solutions:
- You answer the question,
- You don't anwser the question.

If you choose to answer the question, which is noble from you to want
to help other persons, and which is by the way one of the 2 reasons
you are reading groups, you should put arrogance aside, and be
pragmatic in your answer (telling someone to post elsewhere is ok
since you also provide to his answer a trial to an adequate solution).

You will avoid answers like "What does this have to do with PHP? And
if you're planning to say
something like, "I'm using PHP to generate the HTML and Javascript"
don't even bother -- that's not the right answer.". This is NOT
constructive, and a bit insulting.

Respect these principle would have save this whole pointless
conversation, in which, i believe Tom might have think with reason:
"why the hell am i doing here?"

Additionaly and to my own concern, when i ask someone for his opinion
about something i've done, I except a few things:
First, that he respects my work and the principles i'm using to
achieve it. Like i said before there not only one good solution but
plenty of them depending on situations. Second, that the answer given
to my questions are arrogance free, so that i do not feel like a
complete idiot. And finally that the comments and advise that are
given remain as is, and free of subjective argumentation, which means,
avoid things like: "this sucks" or "this is not impressive".

By posting here, i was seeking for professional advise on my work. You
could have answered or not. Someone like Rik Rasmus decided to answer
me, regardless all principle declared before, which shows a complete
disrespect for other people's work. Someone like Rik Rasmus, in my
understanding, doesn't need apologies, and need to present some!

(sorry if i use someone else's post to answer part of my own concerns)

does this have anything to do with my post?

and what does "By posting here, i was seeking for professional advise
on my work.", mean?
Your post in this thread didn't ask for any advice?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Nothing to do with you... only someone had to remind some basic rules
of education should be respected.
By "By posting here, i was seeking for professional advise
on my work." i mean i've put a thread on this group and i felt
insulted by those i was seeking help from, just like Tom felt...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh. But you should really try to respect these groups.

I and others give up a lot of time to try to assist you and others.

Appending a post to a thread and also quoting from my post suggests
that your comment is related to my post.

If you want to get good advice, try to follow nettiquette and general
good manners and help keep these groups clean so that all may benefit.

Anyone can make a mistake. I myself just posted a question on this
group which I should have been able to answer myself.

Making a misake is not a problem. However when helpful folks offer
sound advice about where the poster can get the best advice and
explain why this is not the corrct place, good manners would suggest
being grateful for that advice and not being downright sarcastic and
shooting the messenger.

All too often I see people with very little knowledge asking for
advice and then arguing the toss because the answer was not what they
expected.

.