Re: which is the better option for directory hashing to store large number of image files?
- From: "Steve" <no.one@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:46:36 -0500
Moral: Programming, as well as life, is not always an either-or.
Sometimes a compromise/hybrid is the best solution.
--
Shelly
ahhh, but shelly, the thing i like most is that in programming, it is always
either/or: on/off. to say otherwise is to not know programming. the same
holds true for life. you either do or do not. any notions about the nobility
or superiority of human action in his contemplation of life are simply
false, save the fact that there is none of either. do or do not is all that
remains and that directly linked to his own survivability - as is the
impetous of all animals.
compromise. chuckle.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- which is the better option for directory hashing to store large number of image files?
- From: theCancerus
- Re: which is the better option for directory hashing to store large number of image files?
- From: Jerry Stuckle
- Re: which is the better option for directory hashing to store large number of image files?
- From: NoDude
- Re: which is the better option for directory hashing to store large number of image files?
- From: Shelly
- which is the better option for directory hashing to store large number of image files?
- Prev by Date: Re: Accessing Class Method
- Next by Date: Help Creating a Job Bank
- Previous by thread: Re: which is the better option for directory hashing to store large number of image files?
- Next by thread: Re: which is the better option for directory hashing to store large number of image files?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
