Re: Post with redirect?


"Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:MZCdnbHkv81Q-v7anZ2dnUVZ_vCknZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Steve wrote:
omp.lang.javascript"

you incompetent fuckwit. lol.
That isn't what he asked, S.T.O.O.P.I.D. Why didn't you answer his
question? I did.

perhaps not. i gave him a solution which shows him how to not use
redirection...and how to do a post from php (which you said was
impossible) to his provider. that method averts his problem and doesn't
force his users to enable js.


You have him a piece of a solution which is entirely unworkable in its
entirety. But since script kiddies like you don't understand the entire
scope of what goes on, that's not surprising.

finally jerry, you are absolutely correct. i gave him a piece of a solution.
is a piece of a solution (though an entire description of a more complete
one was given) expected to work in its entirety? wouldn't that make it a
whole solution rather than a piece? ROFLMAO.

and yes, script kiddies don't usually understand much about anything.
however, i'm no script kiddie...so i hardly see the worth in your stating
such common knowledge. oh yeah, did you ever prove i copied code? no? then
shut the *** up already, whining baby! damn! a 60 year old man behaving
like a 12 year old...for 2 days even!

And for your simple mind - I didn't say it was impossible to post from
PHP. I said it was impossible to redirect from PHP. Two entirely
different statements.

oh no. yep. as predicted. backpeddling via the 'i left out the adjective
that would best help me get out of looking like a liar'...the 'it' now
suddenly become 'redirect'. hmmm, so when i say header, location...you'll
come back with, 'i said redirect post data'. dumbass. you speak an entirely
different language than english, my friend!

But you've repeatedly claimed it is possible, yet you haven't shown us how
to do it.

oh no, my claim is NOT that you can redirect post data. my claim was that
you can effectively post data to and process data from external sources. my
goal was to avoid redirection. i was clear with the example code that i gave
and clear in the solution's description. i thought redirection was rather
un-needed.

Please do so - the entire PHP world wants to know your magic secret that
even Zend says is impossible.

that's your strawman, jerry. i never claimed that. follow along please.

you see jerry, when people want your expertise, they often know enough to
suggest a method to do what they want. it is the experienced's job to
listen to the overall goal being sought. *we* should suggest the most
efficient and effective solution. otherwise, you're not giving your
clients the benefit of the experience you have that they are paying you
for. i see now why you are relegated to teaching rather than consulting
for a living. theory is great...solution providers get paid. teachers
tend to be very safe with their employment. producers in the consulting
world live or die by their performance...every day.


And all you do is post scripts you've collected off the internet. At
least I understand the magnitude of what you're proposing. So does the
op. But you've already proven you don't.

oh no, i originated that code. support your claim of pleagurism or stfu. and
if you did understand the magnitude, you'd not have suggested
javascript/ajax as any better than a strictly php solution. AND yours would
have sought to AVOID redirection. boy, i really can see where i considered
everything at a much lower observation point than you! LOL.

But as in everything else, you only posted what you understand. And
that won't do the job.

i posted a possible solution. don't forget, yours was
'comp.lang.javascript'. and using js and ajax does NOTHING to solve the
difficulties you described (and with which i agreed). you suggested ajax
simply because you thought it couldn't be done in php. daft prick.


You posted NO solution. Just a script which does about 2% of what he
wants.

oh, it went from a 'piece of a solution' to 'NO solution'. idiot...and liar.
yes, the function is a very important 2%...the description gets about 60%.
the remaining 38% is describing how to handle the other server's response.

lest i forget to mention, the best you've offered to date is
comp.lang.javascript. laughable.

And everyone else in the world understands why it won't - except little
Stevie, who again has proven he has no idea what he's doing. But he can
copy scripts and claim they're his own. He might even be capable of
changing a couple of variable names.

uhmmm...that function was one i wrote several years ago. there's not much
to it. if you think it's copied, please don't just make claims and run,
as you are wont to do...provide a url with code sufficiently similar to
mine that it could be considered a copy. careful, i use such basic php
functions that there are probably hundreds of sites that have "copied"
each other's code. that'd be a class action suit...but whom to sue!


Yep, which book did you copy it out of? Or what site did you get the
original from? You've already proven you don't know how to handle the
op's problem. Just post scripts you've gotten from somewhere.

look man, if you think i copied it, it would be wise of you to research it
and THEN make the claim...and QUOTE the source.

you have it ass-backward. you make the claim, have no proof, and make
further estimations from a faulty assumption. what a moron.

And no, I don't need to spend my time searching the internet finding how
many places scripts like yours are posted. Experienced programmers can
tell when someone is bullshitting them. And you are.

oh. is this like 'i know i serve the one true god' argument we had a couple
of months back. you require no proof...you just 'know' out of some
'superior' vantage point? just as it was in that argument, one should
require some shred of evidence before believing something as whole-heartedly
as you do. seems that activity is wide-spread among many aspects of your
life. good on you.

But he's completely incapable of understanding the entire problem.

oh no, i looked past his suggested architecture because it creates
un-needed difficulties. i suggested a new approach. again dimwit, you
just copped-out...comp.lang.javascript. funny how you are so nit-picky
here, when your first statement was that it can't be done in php. lol.
perhaps you should be clear *what* can't be done. perhaps you can more
easily backpeddle going that route.

And you're "architecture" creates 50 times more difficulties.

really? and comp.lang.javascript does what? keeps you from posting even an
idea of what to do? yeah, glass houses are great, aren't they.

as for the difficulties? let's hear how you'd do it. and do try to not limit
the audience by requiring js...hmmm.

Again, you claim a redirect can be done in PHP. Show the world how it's
done. Maybe one of the sites you steal your scripts from will show you.

oh no, not my claim. you're building strawmen again. my sample and
description clearly avoid redirection. hmmm...i wonder why?!!!

Come on, troll. Show us. Or we will know you're a troll.

by that logic, you're a troll. i support my claims. you just make them and
run. sounds like you're the prime suspect in that activity.


.

Quantcast