Re: DOCTYPE
- From: Jonas Werres <jonas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:14:03 +0100
If they're not errors, then what's the problem?The problem is the one I mentionend before and you asked for: Nobody will write that on purpose.
And browsers do understand that a lot better than they do XHTML.Do you have an example? The only issue I know is the MIME-type thing with IE.
But you also ignore the rest of my points. How convenient.Ok, what was there? The W3C. Yes, I ignored that. After a look into the source of http://www.w3.org/.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DOCTYPE
- From: Jerry Stuckle
- Re: DOCTYPE
- References:
- DOCTYPE
- From: Jerry
- Re: DOCTYPE
- From: Michael Fesser
- Re: DOCTYPE
- From: Jonas Werres
- Re: DOCTYPE
- From: Rik Wasmus
- Re: DOCTYPE
- From: Jonas Werres
- Re: DOCTYPE
- From: Jerry Stuckle
- Re: DOCTYPE
- From: Jonas Werres
- Re: DOCTYPE
- From: Jerry Stuckle
- DOCTYPE
- Prev by Date: Re: DOCTYPE
- Next by Date: Re: Outputting Images
- Previous by thread: Re: DOCTYPE
- Next by thread: Re: DOCTYPE
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|