Re: DOCTYPE

From: Jonas Werres <jonas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:01:31 +0100

So? They're the ones setting the recommendations. That's what most of the rest of us follow - including the browser developers. And if they say XHTML isn't going anywhere soon, browser developers won't be spending a lot of time supporting it.

Did you have a look at their website?
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: DOCTYPE
  - From: Jerry Stuckle

References:
- DOCTYPE
  - From: Jerry
- Re: DOCTYPE
  - From: Michael Fesser
- Re: DOCTYPE
  - From: Jonas Werres
- Re: DOCTYPE
  - From: Rik Wasmus
- Re: DOCTYPE
  - From: Jonas Werres
- Re: DOCTYPE
  - From: Jerry Stuckle
- Re: DOCTYPE
  - From: Jonas Werres
- Re: DOCTYPE
  - From: Jerry Stuckle
- Re: DOCTYPE
  - From: Jonas Werres
- Re: DOCTYPE
  - From: Jerry Stuckle

Prev by Date: Re: DOCTYPE
Next by Date: Re: time elapsed
Previous by thread: Re: DOCTYPE
Next by thread: Re: DOCTYPE
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: html vs. xhtml
... xhtml has no advantages and several minor disadvantages compared to html4. ... superfluous slashes in their br element tags. ... xhtml is a massive pain in the arse to browser developers, ... Parsing xml is not difficult,, but many idiot ...
(alt.html)
Re: DOCTYPE
... Jonas Werres wrote: ... And if they say XHTML isn't going anywhere soon, browser developers won't be spending a lot of time supporting it. ... JDS Computer Training Corp. ...
(comp.lang.php)