Re: Feedback wanted: new PHP template engine
- From: Egbert Teeselink <skrebbel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 06:05:04 -0700 (PDT)
I didn't testet Farty but absolute requirements are for me:
1. Good error messages if a compile failed
2. Stability
3. Ability to use objects in the template (not visible in the website or
in the samples)
4. Method chaining
Thanks for the feedback!
1 is a disaster right now, as basically anything will get compiled,
possibly into erroneous PHP code, resulting in a parse error in the
compiled file. will work on that one.
2 and 3 should be fine, though it's hard to tell about stability of
course
What do you mean by method chaining? Calling one method with the
results of another is possible by definition, because the expression
code is simply PHP code..
And you shold change the name asap. It's a marketing disaster.
True that, I should. Any suggestions, anyone? I really suck at this,
so stuck with a bad joke. Somehow I'd like to keep a Smarty reference
because of how much it's been inspired by Smarty - without sounding
like a ripoff..
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Feedback wanted: new PHP template engine
- From: Joe Scylla
- Re: Feedback wanted: new PHP template engine
- From: Jeremy
- Re: Feedback wanted: new PHP template engine
- From: Guillaume
- Re: Feedback wanted: new PHP template engine
- From: Erwin Moller
- Re: Feedback wanted: new PHP template engine
- References:
- Feedback wanted: new PHP template engine
- From: Egbert Teeselink
- Re: Feedback wanted: new PHP template engine
- From: Joe Scylla
- Feedback wanted: new PHP template engine
- Prev by Date: Re: unable to connect to mssql server
- Next by Date: Re: Feedback wanted: new PHP template engine
- Previous by thread: Re: Feedback wanted: new PHP template engine
- Next by thread: Re: Feedback wanted: new PHP template engine
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|