Re: Trying to build a database driven website
- From: doznot <david.oznot@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 06:19:00 -0600
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
All the rest of my sites use databases heavily, also. But they aren't a CMS, so they have very little HTML in the database.
Finally--after all this time--an answer with specific argument, rather
than unsupported insult. Good work Jerry. You're coming around.
OK, it appears we have a semantic hair to split.
Database-driven sites don'tstore HTML fragments, only CMSs do.
In a database-driven site, by your definition, every string and every tag from every page is stored in a table.column so it can be directly updated by sql.
*If* such a system existed, I accept your argument, for that system
and all others like it.
I'm signing off this thread permanently, regardless response.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Trying to build a database driven website
- From: Jerry Stuckle
- Re: Trying to build a database driven website
- From: Jerry Stuckle
- Re: Trying to build a database driven website
- References:
- Re: Trying to build a database driven website
- From: doznot
- Re: Trying to build a database driven website
- From: Jerry Stuckle
- Re: Trying to build a database driven website
- Prev by Date: downloading a zip archive from another server
- Next by Date: Re: POSTing to XML...
- Previous by thread: Re: Trying to build a database driven website
- Next by thread: Re: Trying to build a database driven website
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|