Re: Error/ Warning messages in log files (OS 121) and (OS 64)
From: David Robley (robleyd_at_ozemail.com.au)
Date: 01/07/04
- Next message: Eli Hen: "picturing webpage"
- Previous message: Dan Mahoney: "Suexec/SafeMode Hybrid [repost]"
- In reply to: Trevor Dowling: "Error/ Warning messages in log files (OS 121) and (OS 64)"
- Next in thread: AndrewM: "Re: Error/ Warning messages in log files (OS 121) and (OS 64)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: php-general@lists.php.net Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 20:48:22 +1030
In article <20040106112347.6124.qmail@pb1.pair.com>, td01@csr.com says...
> (Relisted as no response from over Xmas period)
>
> Hi,
>
> I am having a real problem with error messages posted in the error.log file
>
> in the Apache directory. I have been doing lots of searches to find a
>
> solution and it seems obvious that many people are see this issue but I can
>
> find no resolution or explanation for the entries (see below).
>
> PHP Bug #25570 seemed to be a solution but the version of php I am using is
>
> 4.3.2 which is claimed to not exhibit the bug described in 25570.
>
> The system is running on a Win2K box, and we are using php, sql and Apache.
>
>
> Anyone out there have an idea of how to fix this issue?
>
> Thanks
>
> Trevor
>
>
>
>
>
> Some system info:
>
> System Windows NT UKRBCSR01 5.0 build 2195
>
> Build Date May 28 2003 15:06:05
>
> Server API Apache 2.0 Handler
>
> Apache/2.0.47 (Win32) PHP/4.3.2
>
> This is the more worring of the issues:
>
> 21:18:49 2003 [notice] Parent: child process exited with status
>
> 4294967295 -- Restarting.
>
>
>
> But I am assuming that some or all of these are related.
>
> 21:19:44 2003 [warn] (OS 121)The semaphore timeout period has expired. :
>
> winnt_accept: Asynchronous AcceptEx failed.
>
> 00:50:58 2003 [warn] (OS 64)The specified network name is no longer
>
> available. : winnt_accept: Asynchronous AcceptEx failed.
One or more of the results from
http://www.google.com/search?q=Asynchronous+AcceptEx+failed
may provide some insight into the problem?
Cheers
-- Quod subigo farinam A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet?
- Next message: Eli Hen: "picturing webpage"
- Previous message: Dan Mahoney: "Suexec/SafeMode Hybrid [repost]"
- In reply to: Trevor Dowling: "Error/ Warning messages in log files (OS 121) and (OS 64)"
- Next in thread: AndrewM: "Re: Error/ Warning messages in log files (OS 121) and (OS 64)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|