large includes vs small includes with lots of reads
Next message: Ruben Duarte: "Send files before the php script executes"
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 13:41:36 GMT
I'm trying to tweak my server a bit and wonder if it is better to have a
large include file, say 20kb with 15 functions, maybe 3 or 4 used on any
given page, or to have each function in it's own file and include them as
needed. Is it faster/more efficient to read one large file or several
smaller ones? RS Linux server with a gig of memory.
**** remove the z's from my email address to reach me ****
Hans
Next message: Ruben Duarte: "Send files before the php script executes"
Relevant Pages
- Re: Memory management
... OS to using 1 gig of memory? ... > Microsoft SQL Server MVP ... >>> Microsoft SQL Server MVP ...
(microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering) - Re: Event ID 9582
... I am running Windows 2000 server with SP4. ... ML 370 with I believe 1 gig of memory. ... I wasn't sure if that was a problem with the 16 gig limit ...
(microsoft.public.exchange2000.information.store) - Available Excel Resources Testing
... "the current memory being used" (all in terms of Excel's allotments given ... I have Excel 2003 Pro, it limits you to 1 gig of RAM for example, regardless ... My server has 2 gig's, ... criteria I am not aware of). ...
(microsoft.public.excel.misc) - Re: Memory management
... There is only one virtual server even though you have two host nodes. ... Memory is reserved for instances, ... I have 12 gig of memory on each box. ... which enables that by default. ...
(microsoft.public.sqlserver.clustering) - Re: store.exe
... Our server is having the same issue. ... gig, we were rebooting the server every week due to ... Haven't had to reboot with the new memory ... >> manager shows that store.exe is slowly growing again. ...
(microsoft.public.exchange2000.information.store) |
|
