Re: [PHP] php redirection..
- From: shiflett@xxxxxxx (Chris Shiflett)
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 22:17:44 -0500
Richard Lynch wrote:
You mean Refresh is a real header?
Yeah, although if I remember correctly, the W3C really dislikes people
using it for redirection instead of just refreshing the current URL. If
that's the case, however, why can we indicate the URL at all? :-)
A few years ago, someone conducted some pretty extensive research into
browser support for Refresh. I can't seem to find the URL, but the
results demonstrated extremely widespread support. (I can't imagine
support for a real HTTP header being poorer than support for the same
header expressed as http-equiv.)
Anyway, it's as real as Content-Disposition. :-)
Chris
--
Chris Shiflett
http://shiflett.org/
.
- References:
- RE: [PHP] php redirection..
- From: "bruce"
- RE: [PHP] php redirection..
- From: "Richard Lynch"
- Re: [PHP] php redirection..
- From: Chris Shiflett
- Re: [PHP] php redirection..
- From: "Richard Lynch"
- RE: [PHP] php redirection..
- Prev by Date: ob_flush() possible memory leak in Apache
- Next by Date: Re: [PHP] Problems with Zip+IE6
- Previous by thread: Re: [PHP] php redirection..
- Next by thread: Re: php redirection..
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|