Re: [PHP] Re: Re: A Little Something.

On 22 May 2008, at 09:56, Robin Vickery wrote:
2008/5/21 Stut <stuttle@xxxxxxxxx>:
I was going to ignore this, but I'm in a confrontational mood today, so
please accept my apologies for the noise.

On 21 May 2008, at 14:08, Michelle Konzack wrote:

Am 2008-05-12 15:40:54, schrieb Stut:
Note: I am working for the french Ministry of Defense.

Ooh, give 'em a peanut. I live and work in the UK and every site I work on
that uses Google Analytics has nothing specific about Google Analytics in
the privacy policy. They all talk about use of cookies, IP addresses and
server logs and I've never had any complaints.

http://www.google.com/analytics/tos.html

7. PRIVACY . You will not (and will not allow any third party to) use
the Service to track or collect personally identifiable information of
Internet users, nor will You (or will You allow any third party to)
associate any data gathered from Your website(s) (or such third
parties' website(s)) with any personally identifying information from
any source as part of Your use (or such third parties' use) of the
Service. You will have and abide by an appropriate privacy policy and
will comply with all applicable laws relating to the collection of
information from visitors to Your websites. You must post a privacy
policy and that policy must provide notice of your use of a cookie
that collects anonymous traffic data.

So yeah, you don't need to specifically mention google-analytics. And
you're definitely
not allowed to link it to any personally identifying information. On
pain of Lawyers.

I think that's what I said, but thanks for the clarification.

But, at risk of labouring the point, I don't have an issue if you decide to
worry about inconsequential things like websites gathering anonymous usage
data so they can improve the experience for you. I couldn't care less if you
disable Javascript to prevent evil popup ads. I don't really give a damn if
you decide to use lynx as the ultimate surfer condom.

Really, I've no problem with sites gathering anonymous usage data. I only get
a little more wary when it's a third-party collecting the data as I
have no relationship
with them.

I can kinda understand that, especially since Google could, if they wanted to, combine data from your travels around different sites to build a better picture of you, but since it's all anonymous the only use it would have is to provide better targeted advertising. I personally have no issue with that since if I have to see ads on the sites I visit I'd rather they were relevant to me.

On the other hand, it really does depend who the third party is: I'm not that
bothered about Google. But I would block anything and everything from
Phorm or the like without a second thought.

Indeed, but Phorm is a completely different beast. In fact it's likely to be impossible to block content coming from Phorm since their system can potentially inject arbitrary code into pages before they reach you - you may not even know it's coming from them unless you read a sites privacy policy.

The only way to block it will be to change to an ISP that doesn't use them. I wouldn't worry about it though, if it's going to be an opt-in service (which it looks like it will) I don't see enough people doing that to make it financially viable.

My issue is purely and simply that if someone decides to remove half the
code for something they should not feel they have the right to complain to
the developers when they see errors. You wouldn't expect a car to work if
you removed all the cylinders, would you? But I'd love to see the persons
face when you take it back and complain.

I don't think that's an accurate metaphor. In this case they were
allowing all the
code from the originating web server to run, but were blocking an independent
third party server.

It's more like expecting a car to work when you remove the trailer.

Not really since the car doesn't need the trailer to function properly. Maybe a better metaphor would be removing the aerial and then complaining that the radio reception is very poor.

Sometimes I wonder why I bother.

Pure contrariness? That's certainly my major motivation.

I do like disagreeing with people, especially when I think/know I'm right.

-Stut

--
http://stut.net/
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: [PHP] Re: Re: A Little Something.
    ... that uses Google Analytics has nothing specific about Google Analytics in ... the privacy policy. ... nor will You (or will You allow any third party to) ... I've no problem with sites gathering anonymous usage data. ...
    (php.general)
  • Re: Really interesting paleogeographic map suggests ocean basins opening and closing repeatedly in t
    ... Google Earth Pro. ... licenses govern your agreement with Google for the use of Google products or ... The Google Software, and any portion thereof, and the Third Party Software, ... for any military purpose, and not license, sell, provide or distribute ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: [Full-disclosure] Google Secure Access or "How to have people download a trojan."
    ... Google Secure Access is a Trojan Horse, and in particular, the application ... Google is collecting personal information because the final paragraph of the ... previously cited Google Secure Access Privacy Policy states that there are ...
    (Full-Disclosure)
  • Re: KH free trials promo - your thoughts
    ... purposes set forth in the privacy policy*. ... information) with third party individuals and entities that we employ ... your Active Information (other than your Social Security Number-related ... advertisers and marketers, think may be of interest to you. ...
    (rec.sport.unicycling)
  • Re: Can you mail letters from Google?
    ... "The phrasing and qualifiers in the Gmail privacy policy are creepy enough, ... scanned from incoming email, and associate these with the incoming email ... Google won't keep this information for possible future use. ...
    (rec.music.gdead)