Re: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- From: per@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Per Jessen)
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:15:18 +0100
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
i never understand this, if i was makign a browser I'd be "where's
the rfc's" then code it to implement those rfc's - why people choose
not to is beyond me?
World domination is part of the reasoning ...
/Per Jessen, Zürich
well that bubble should have popped..
from some of my sites:
Browser % visits
Firefox 88.43%
Internet Explorer 9.99%
Firefox 46.89%
Internet Explorer 37.66%
Opera 7.36%
Safari 5.39%
Chrome 2.17%
Firefox 46.80%
Internet Explorer 42.45%
Safari 5.36%
Opera 3.07%
Mozilla 1.22%
I have not looked at any of my own stats for quite a while, but yours
are just too good to be true :-)
/Per Jessen, Zürich
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Stats (was anchor name on URL)
- From: tedd
- Re: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- From: Nathan Rixham
- Stats (was anchor name on URL)
- References:
- Re: anchor name on URL
- From: "Stan"
- RE: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- From: "Boyd, Todd M."
- Re: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- From: Ashley Sheridan
- Re: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- From: Ashley Sheridan
- Re: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- From: "Richard Heyes"
- Re: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- From: Ashley Sheridan
- Re: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- From: Micah Gersten
- Re: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- From: Craige Leeder
- Re: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- From: Per Jessen
- Re: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- From: Nathan Rixham
- Re: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- From: Per Jessen
- Re: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- From: Nathan Rixham
- Re: anchor name on URL
- Prev by Date: Re: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- Next by Date: Re: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- Previous by thread: Re: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- Next by thread: Re: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|