Re: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- From: nrixham@xxxxxxxxx (Nathan Rixham)
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:42:40 +0000
Per Jessen wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:Nathan Rixham wrote:well that bubble should have popped..
i never understand this, if i was makign a browser I'd be "where'sWorld domination is part of the reasoning ...
the rfc's" then code it to implement those rfc's - why people choose
not to is beyond me?
/Per Jessen, Zürich
from some of my sites:
Browser % visits
Firefox 88.43%
Internet Explorer 9.99%
Firefox 46.89%
Internet Explorer 37.66%
Opera 7.36%
Safari 5.39%
Chrome 2.17%
Firefox 46.80%
Internet Explorer 42.45%
Safari 5.36%
Opera 3.07%
Mozilla 1.22%
I have not looked at any of my own stats for quite a while, but yours
are just too good to be true :-)
/Per Jessen, Zürich
they're all music sites for the above..
site 1 = trance news, charts etc
site 2 = radio station
site 3 = mp3 download site
was suprised myself the stats are inline with my techy sites which consitently sit around 60% firefox, 25% ie
.
- References:
- Re: anchor name on URL
- From: "Stan"
- RE: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- From: "Boyd, Todd M."
- Re: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- From: Ashley Sheridan
- Re: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- From: Ashley Sheridan
- Re: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- From: "Richard Heyes"
- Re: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- From: Ashley Sheridan
- Re: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- From: Micah Gersten
- Re: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- From: Craige Leeder
- Re: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- From: Per Jessen
- Re: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- From: Nathan Rixham
- Re: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- From: Per Jessen
- Re: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- From: Nathan Rixham
- Re: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- From: Per Jessen
- Re: anchor name on URL
- Prev by Date: Re: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- Next by Date: Re: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- Previous by thread: Re: [PHP] Re: anchor name on URL
- Next by thread: Stats (was anchor name on URL)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|