Re: newbie regxp question
From: Jürgen Exner (jurgenex_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 10/01/03
- Next message: Jürgen Exner: "Re: newbie regxp question"
- Previous message: James E Keenan: "Re: Passing Variables from One Perlscript to Another"
- Next in thread: Jürgen Exner: "Re: newbie regxp question"
- Maybe reply: Jürgen Exner: "Re: newbie regxp question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 22:48:57 GMT
Jesper wrote:
> Ok, fair enough - I just relate the =~ operator to regxp (newbie :)).
Hmmm, well, aehh, but the binding operator =~ doesn't have anything to do
with REs at all.
Of the top of my head there are only three operators/functions which use
REs:
- split
- s
- m
I'm sure someone will jump in if I forgot one.
Note: glob() and its relatives don't use REs but shell wildcards.
jue
- Next message: Jürgen Exner: "Re: newbie regxp question"
- Previous message: James E Keenan: "Re: Passing Variables from One Perlscript to Another"
- Next in thread: Jürgen Exner: "Re: newbie regxp question"
- Maybe reply: Jürgen Exner: "Re: newbie regxp question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|