Re: data manipulation
From: Gunnar Hjalmarsson (noreply_at_gunnar.cc)
Date: 10/10/03
- Next message: nobull_at_mail.com: "Re: trying to understand a hash - understanding has occured"
- Previous message: Steve Grazzini: "Re: Efficient field splitting? unpack or substr"
- In reply to: Bob: "Re: data manipulation"
- Next in thread: Tad McClellan: "Re: data manipulation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:00:03 +0200
Bob wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation, And I already understood the
> implication of the whole file being in memory. In this case, it is
> not a problem, the log is generally ony 3-5Meg but never over
> 50Meg.
I'm glad to be able to help, Bob. My apologies for being assumptive in
my first reply - you were obviously ready to put more effort in it
than I first thought. ;-)
> For those interested, I have included the full script below
Looks good to me.
-- Gunnar Hjalmarsson Email: http://www.gunnar.cc/cgi-bin/contact.pl
- Next message: nobull_at_mail.com: "Re: trying to understand a hash - understanding has occured"
- Previous message: Steve Grazzini: "Re: Efficient field splitting? unpack or substr"
- In reply to: Bob: "Re: data manipulation"
- Next in thread: Tad McClellan: "Re: data manipulation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
