Re: why do some mail servers treat perl generated mails as Bulk

From: Malcolm Dew-Jones (yf110_at_vtn1.victoria.tc.ca)
Date: 02/13/04

  • Next message: Christopher Mattern: "Re: hidden perl"
    Date: 13 Feb 2004 12:18:24 -0800
    
    

    KK (kewlkarun@yahoo.com) wrote:
    : Hi,
    : With Mail::Sender I could finally able to send mails from windows
    : machine. However, when I use yahoo DSL HMTP mail server, my mails are
    : considered Bulk Emails. Is there a way I can avoid this ?

    Apparently not if you send from your PC using your current provider.

    Yahoo is probably looking at your ip address. Many many many addresses
    are in untrusted ranges and will be flagged or simply discarded by many
    systems that receive mail.

    To send mail reliably, you need to find a host that is trusted by systems
    that receive mail and send your mail from that host. Depending on the
    host, you may be able to send mail from your PC using smtp but will point
    the smtp at your ISP's mail host and use it as a relay, so the recipients
    see the trusted host's ip.

    I'm not saying this is technically required, or good or bad, I'm just
    saying that that is often what you must do in practise if you wish to
    upload your message data into the reciepients file space.

    : Peon, just curious as to why cant I use these modules to post mails
    : to employers?

    He said don't _spam_ employers using these modules. You could use them to
    send other mail to employers. Beware though that sending multiple copies
    of similar documents to anyone is liable to put your mail and/or ip
    address into various spammer lists.

    : would they be detecting them as spam? if yes, how?

    E.g. DCC, RAZOR

    : what
    : is the best way to mail the same mail to 10 different people?

    10 copies is bulk, no? so you'll notice the yahoo bulk flag would have
    been correct in this case.

    I doubt that ten copies would get you onto any/many spam lists, though it
    might. Unless you have a pre-existing permission to send mail then the
    best thing is to tailor each mail to the specific requirements of the
    recipient so that the mail is truly "on topic" for the receipient when
    they read it. Remember though that what a sender considers "on topic"
    is commonly just "the usual crap" to many of the recipients.

    : After all, programming should be practical!

    rejecting/flagging mail from untrusted ip's is very practical - from the
    recipient's point of view.


  • Next message: Christopher Mattern: "Re: hidden perl"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: blocking icmp protocol
      ... but still this ip can ping my host ... Do You Yahoo!? ... Mail has the best spam protection around ...
      (RedHat)
    • Re: How to verify speed of a 1Gb/s network?
      ... On the other host run ... On a 1 Gigabit/s network, ... Do You Yahoo!? ... Tired of spam? ...
      (Fedora)
    • blocking icmp protocol
      ... but still this ip can ping my host ... Do You Yahoo!? ... Mail has the best spam protection around ...
      (RedHat)
    • Re: Reprocessing sendmail failed messages
      ... sendmail gurus on this list that can help me... ... (reason: 550 Host unknown) ... Do You Yahoo!? ... Mail has the best spam ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • RE: forgotten admin password
      ... Do You Yahoo!? ... Mail has the best spam ... Bank Zachodni WBK S.A. z siedziba we Wroclawiu, ... Wiadomosc ta oraz wszelkie zalaczone do niej pliki sa tajemnica nadawcy ...
      (Pen-Test)