Re: CGi parameters lost
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 08:33:26 GMT
James <turajbNOSPAM@hoflink.com> wrote:
[snip - stuff about recent IE 'features']
Maybe it's just me, but is MS making it overly difficult to work with their
products.
I sure wish more people would use mozilla, or at least a standards-based
client that doesn't pull all these weird tricks.
[ note: Follow-Up set, and crossposted to more appropriate newsgroup ]
Jamie
Relevant Pages
- Re: Cross-Browser onmousedown JavaScript
... It would only make sense to implement the W3C events model if there is a demand for currently unused event features; and if this were happening, nothing would prevent Microsoft from extending the current model, rather than implementing the W3C's model. ... Given this situation, two solutions are available: either change/correct the scripts, or change/evolve the browser's model. ... The choice of changing the model looks like the less painful; after all, scripts do not need to updated, and the browser ends up with more capabilities, right? ... (comp.lang.javascript) - =?iso-8859-1?q?Re:_Snape=B9s_Overlooked_Memory?=
... Snape was doing perfect potions for Sluggie on his "first attempt", ... > instead of specifically James or Snape. ... I feel safe in ruling out PUBLIC humiliation for James in ANY ... (alt.fan.harry-potter) - Re: VFP 9 on Windows 98 SE
... and the only reason that you would'nt recoup your ... My point is that if you are not using the productivity features of VFP, ... (microsoft.public.fox.programmer.exchange) - Re: z/OS and OS/VS Cobol
... This might be a sign as to why the standards were written as they were; ... >often ignore 'new features that are available'. ... >What is the true benefit of 70's style programming? ... (comp.lang.cobol) - Re: Great SWT Program
... A user using a GUI app may notice something ... and notice tedium using a GUI app to do it. ... all available features, in that one can do so by poking around in ... (comp.lang.java.programmer) |
|