cywin versus activestate on xp
From: usenet_spam_cygwin (beau_at_oblios-cap.com)
Date: 04/29/04
- Next message: Paul Lalli: "Re: How do I do this one-liner (windows command) in perl ?"
- Previous message: Shailesh: "Re: convert utf8 to latin-1/iso-8859-1"
- Next in thread: David K. Wall: "Re: cywin versus activestate on xp"
- Reply: David K. Wall: "Re: cywin versus activestate on xp"
- Reply: zzapper: "Re: cywin versus activestate on xp"
- Reply: Robin: "Re: cywin versus activestate on xp"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 20:03:27 GMT
Howdy. A google search "activestate versus cygwin" didn't do me much
good, so I'm asking the fine folks at comp.lang.perl.misc: any clear
reason to use one over the other? My objective, really, is as seamless as
possible an experience as I work my way through the llama book for the
first time. Many thanks! (My feelings won't be hurt by backchannel
responses if you feel it's not sufficiently on topic.)
-- beau
- Next message: Paul Lalli: "Re: How do I do this one-liner (windows command) in perl ?"
- Previous message: Shailesh: "Re: convert utf8 to latin-1/iso-8859-1"
- Next in thread: David K. Wall: "Re: cywin versus activestate on xp"
- Reply: David K. Wall: "Re: cywin versus activestate on xp"
- Reply: zzapper: "Re: cywin versus activestate on xp"
- Reply: Robin: "Re: cywin versus activestate on xp"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|