Re: Earthquake forecasting program Aug. 16, 2004
From: Oriel36 (geraldkelleher_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 08/20/04
- Next message: srini: "Re: How to upload a file from a local pc to a web server from a html page????"
- Previous message: Bernard El-Hagin: "Re: what's the best environment to exercise Perl?"
- In reply to: Bob Officer: "Re: Earthquake forecasting program Aug. 16, 2004"
- Next in thread: MichiganBob: "Re: Earthquake forecasting program Aug. 16, 2004"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 20 Aug 2004 07:46:15 -0700
Bob Officer <bobofficers@invalid.net> wrote in message news:<6q0ai0lrj7nbqha46q3aug2hn2ell7chl6@4ax.com>...
> On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:31:05 GMT, in sci.geo.earthquakes, "John W. Kennedy"
> <jwkenne@attglobal.net> wrote:
>
> >Oriel36 wrote:
> >> All gravitational observations are based on the sidereal format which
> >> is the only means to determine a geocentric/heliocentric orbital
> >> equivalency.After Kepler,Galileo and others struggled for recognition
> >> of the heliocentric motion of the planets,Newton reverted back to an
> >> odd mixture of geocentrism and heliocentrism to get his gravitational
> >> agenda to work.He used Flamsteed erroneous proof for axial
> >> rotational/stellar circumpolar equivalency and morphed it into a
> >> geocentric/heliocentric orbital equivalency.
> >>
> >>
> >> "PHÆNOMENON IV.
> >> That the fixed stars being at rest, the periodic times of the five
> >> primary planets, and (whether of the sun about the earth, or) of the
> >> earth about the sun, are in the sesquiplicate proportion of their mean
> >> distances from the sun.
> >>
> >> http://members.tripod.com/~gravitee/phaenomena.htm
> >>
> >> I will put it another way,at dawn,the Earth axially rotates out of its
> >> orbital shadow but if you are the minset of sunrise and sunset you
> >> will place great stake in the position of the Sun in the sky and this
> >> is exactly where you are at, so is everyone else thanks to Newton.In
> >> the early 1920's they jettisoned Newton's geocentric/heliocentric
> >> framehopping and resorted to homocentrism which is why the 'every
> >> valid point is the center of the universe' is paraded today for the
> >> sake of the 'laws of physics'.
> >
> >Yes, folks, you read it right. Not only is "Oriel36" an
> >Einstein-denier, he is also a Newton-denier, as I have verified from his
> >postings elsewhere.
> >
> >Can't we all just *plonk* him?
>
> Agreed a wonderful idea.
Hey,have a ball,seeing that 'einstein ' has entered the vocabulary
associated with 'genius',I wonder how many would be capable of
figuring out what you have to fabricate to being one.
Don't you love the story of Newton,Maxwell,Lorentz,Albert where Albert
got rid of Newton's aether in 1905,especially when Newton already had
no use for a medium no more than Kepler or Copernicus had.
http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Special_relativity#Motivation_for_the_theory_of_special_relativity
"The fictitious matter which is imagined as filling the whole of space
is of no use for explaining the phenomena of Nature, since the motions
of the planets and comets are better explained without it, by means of
gravity; and it has never yet been explained how this matter accounts
for gravity. The only thing which matter of this sort could do, would
be to interfere with and slow down the motions of those large
celestial bodies, and weaken the order of Nature; and in the
microscopic pores of bodies, it would put a stop to the vibrations of
their parts which their heat and all their active force consists in.
Further, since matter of this sort is not only completely useless, but
would actually interfere with the operations of Nature, and [314]
weaken them, there is no solid reason why we should believe in any
such matter at all. Consequently, it is to be utterly rejected."
Optics 1704
"I have no regard in this place to a medium, if any such there is,
that freely pervades the interstices between the parts of bodies.
http://members.tripod.com/~gravitee/definitions.htm#time
Principia 1687
In a more innocent and honest age,these men recognised the dilemma,you
just bury your heads in a fabrication,einstein-denier indeed !.
- Next message: srini: "Re: How to upload a file from a local pc to a web server from a html page????"
- Previous message: Bernard El-Hagin: "Re: what's the best environment to exercise Perl?"
- In reply to: Bob Officer: "Re: Earthquake forecasting program Aug. 16, 2004"
- Next in thread: MichiganBob: "Re: Earthquake forecasting program Aug. 16, 2004"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
