Re: trouble with very simple regexp
- From: "BerkHolz, Steven" <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 18:19:10 -0400
My thanks to everyone's assistance.
joe[_-]?blow worked fine.
I guess I didn't realize the ? worked after a character set.
--
Steven BerkHolz
Send to Domain TESCOGroup dot com, username SB
Note: you may also want to know that you should never send mail to:
blacklist-my-ip@xxxxxxxxx
info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
listme@xxxxxxxxx
spamtrap@xxxxxxxxx
spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
spamtrap@xxxxxxxxx
"Tad McClellan" <tadmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:slrnd5vov3.ck1.tadmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> BerkHolz, Steven <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I will try the joe[_-]?blow or joe(_|-)?blow.
>> Is one more efficient than the other
>
>
> perldoc Benchmark
>
>
> --
> Tad McClellan SGML consulting
> tadmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Perl programming
> Fort Worth, Texas
.
- References:
- trouble with very simple regexp
- From: BerkHolz, Steven
- Re: trouble with very simple regexp
- From: peter pilsl
- Re: trouble with very simple regexp
- From: Jeff Stampes
- Re: trouble with very simple regexp
- From: BerkHolz, Steven
- Re: trouble with very simple regexp
- From: Tad McClellan
- trouble with very simple regexp
- Prev by Date: NET::SMTP_auth error
- Next by Date: Re: NET::SMTP_auth error
- Previous by thread: Re: trouble with very simple regexp
- Next by thread: Re: trouble with very simple regexp
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|