Re: Google Groups and netiquette



Gunnar Hjalmarsson <noreply@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:3eq311F4drdmU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

> A. Sinan Unur wrote:
>> Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
>>> It seems like groups-beta.google.com has undergone a change which
>>> leads people to not quote anything when replying to a message.
>>> Maybe those who dislike when people reply without providing context
>>> should better call Google's attention to the problem rather than
>>> blaming GG posters...
>>
>> I will complain to Google Groups regarding this,
>
> Good!

Thank you. I already wrote them a nice (I think) note suggesting they
could improve the interface. We'll see if anything happens.

>> wholesale killfiling of all Google Groups posts is beginning to
>> look like an attractive option.
>
> Well, M$ encourages top posting, Google encourages no context at
> all... It's not obvious to me that killfiling is the best way to deal
> with this kind of dilemma.

I don't know what *the* solution is, but this option is looking like a
convenient one for me.

> We won't likely convince those giants that they'd better stay out of
> Usenet. Accordingly, we'll probably have to endure postings from both
> Newsreaders and web based forums.

Possibly. However, if the posters from Google Groups got in on the act,
and complained that this misfeature of their interface is making it
harder for them to get good answers, and therefore would rather switch
to a real newsreader, that should have an impact.

> Maybe it's time to revise the posting guidelines. You *can* deal with
> postings without context by simply viewing messages by thread, right?

That requires an exponential increase in the time it would take to
figure out what is being discussed, who is right, who suggested what etc
as the thread gets longer and longer. Why should you or I bear that
cost?

The only revision to the posting guidelines might be a note specific to
Google Groups users, but then it would require an extra burden on Tad to
keep up with whatever changes Google might make to their interface in
the future. The rule is simple, whatever software you are using, the
burden is on you to figure out how to compose an effective follow-up.

> After all, all these complaints about people's non-compliance with the
> format guidelines aren't very fruitful.

If people did not get away with non-compliance, then they would be
forced to learn the particular quirks of the software *they chose* to
post.

Just like teaching how to use the operating system they chose to use is
not our job, teaching them how to use their newsreader, or catering to
their ignorance cannot be our job either.

Sinan

--
A. Sinan Unur <1usa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
(reverse each component and remove .invalid for email address)

comp.lang.perl.misc guidelines on the WWW:
http://mail.augustmail.com/~tadmc/clpmisc/clpmisc_guidelines.html
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: problem with division
    ... where do I see the posting rules, ... from Google Groups. ... "The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. ... The Posting Guidelines are posted to this group twice a week. ...
    (comp.lang.perl.misc)
  • India archaeological measurments [was: Re: temple/pyramid plans]
    ... I was posting from Google Groups and was not aware I was ... Does anyone have an interest in sites in India? ... this helps you understand why I am posting; ... Turns out Chris had only posted ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: This News Group is broken
    ... The rate at which posts appear is ... topics showing posting activity at the top of the list. ... "This Google Groups archive is not available. ... Fucking stupid computer geek stuff. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Google Groups versus moderated newsgroups versus fnording
    ... current panic in t.o, that Google Groups frequently ... problems posting at all, ... There's a couple posts I ... providers and showing gmail addys are also "disappearing"; ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Google Groups versus moderated newsgroups versus fnording
    ... current panic in t.o, that Google Groups frequently ... problems posting at all, ... There's a couple posts I ... providers and showing gmail addys are also "disappearing"; ...
    (talk.origins)