Re: A program to measure flops in Perl (should it be this "off"?)
- From: Eric Schwartz <emschwar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:19:28 -0600
px1138@xxxxxxxxx writes:
> Meh, then I'll just deal with it . Was just wondering if in general i
> should be seeing such dismal performance as compared to C.
The problem is, there is no "in general". While Perl programs often
have a huge startup cost relative to C or C++ programs, sometimes the
code perl generates for a given construct is faster than a
poorly-written C version of the same construct (well-written C is
almost always going to be faster). Sometimes it will be worse. The
only way to know is for you to show us your code.
> No need for others to respond, sorry for crashing your group, I'll
> be going now.
That's your choice. Hope it works out for you.
-=Eric
.
- References:
- A program to measure flops in Perl (should it be this "off"?)
- From: px1138
- Re: A program to measure flops in Perl (should it be this "off"?)
- From: A. Sinan Unur
- Re: A program to measure flops in Perl (should it be this "off"?)
- From: px1138
- A program to measure flops in Perl (should it be this "off"?)
- Prev by Date: Re: DBI prepare and fetch
- Next by Date: Re: problem about the perl code. thanks for any comments
- Previous by thread: Re: A program to measure flops in Perl (should it be this "off"?)
- Next by thread: Re: A program to measure flops in Perl (should it be this "off"?)
- Index(es):