Re: Question about perlreref - are {n} and {n}? different?
- From: "Dr.Ruud" <rvtol+news@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 01:18:08 +0200
usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx schreef:
> Dr.Ruud:
>> The 'Must occur ... no more than m times' is not accurate.
>
> I'm confused - the output seems consistent with the perlreref
> statement. Can you explain which one(s) of these outputs you feel is
> inconsistent, and what you would have expected it to be?
I did not expect any of the outputs to be different.
It's just nitpicking. The description says that if m=50, my 'a' must not
occur more than 50 times, so I gave it 100 'a'-s.
"Must occur at least n times but no more than m times" -->
"Must match at least n times, and will try to match up to m times".
--
Affijn, Ruud
"Gewoon is een tijger."
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: question about forked processes writing to the same file
- Next by Date: Re: create columns from lines in perl
- Previous by thread: Re: Question about perlreref - are {n} and {n}? different?
- Next by thread: Re: Question about perlreref - are {n} and {n}? different?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|