Re: ASTM checksum
- From: Spin <cNaOlSePbA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 12:50:49 -0600
usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Are the ASTM specs for a cksum different from the "ordinary" POSIX
No, because the one you linked to gives an integral number whereas the ASTM model will return two-digit hexadecimal figures like 7A.checksum that's been around since the epoch?
http://search.cpan.org/~ahamm/String-CRC-Cksum-0.03/Cksum.pm
Spin .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ASTM checksum
- From: Jim Gibson
- Re: ASTM checksum
- References:
- ASTM checksum
- From: Spin
- Re: ASTM checksum
- From: usenet
- ASTM checksum
- Prev by Date: Re: substr forces scalar context with array argument
- Next by Date: Re: substr forces scalar context with array argument
- Previous by thread: Re: ASTM checksum
- Next by thread: Re: ASTM checksum
- Index(es):
