Re: Parse a filename (this SHOULD be easy, right?)
- From: "attn.steven.kuo@xxxxxxxxx" <attn.steven.kuo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 14 Dec 2005 19:32:50 -0800
usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> attn.steven.kuo@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >>> some code
>
> That works perfectly, thanks. But it does seem like a whole lot of
> code to throw at what seems like a fairly simple problem.
>
> If I get close to my screen and take a whiff, it smells like a problem
> that needs to be sprayed with a regex. But the only bottle of regex
> skills that I have is not very full...
>
Actually, now that I'm looking at the solution posted by
"Big and Blue", I prefer his regular expession
to mine.
--
Regards,
Steven
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Parse a filename (this SHOULD be easy, right?)
- From: usenet
- Re: Parse a filename (this SHOULD be easy, right?)
- References:
- Parse a filename (this SHOULD be easy, right?)
- From: usenet
- Re: Parse a filename (this SHOULD be easy, right?)
- From: attn.steven.kuo@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Parse a filename (this SHOULD be easy, right?)
- From: usenet
- Parse a filename (this SHOULD be easy, right?)
- Prev by Date: Re: Simple comparison statement that doesn't work
- Next by Date: Re: Parse a filename (this SHOULD be easy, right?)
- Previous by thread: Re: Parse a filename (this SHOULD be easy, right?)
- Next by thread: Re: Parse a filename (this SHOULD be easy, right?)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
