Re: A question of speed
- From: Christian Winter <thepoet_nospam@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 15:10:35 +0200
Robert Hicks wrote:
anno4...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:Robert Hicks <sigzero@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in comp.lang.perl.misc:That is what I was thinking, even if it was an 8 hour business day thatI have some co-workers that are writing an email parser (not sure of5000 emails per day, that's 17 seconds per message. You can do a lot
the specifics) that is going to process around 5000 emails a day. I
suggested that they go a pure Perl route but they are leary about Perl
being "fast" enough to parse that many emails.
I have no definitive experience with something on this scale but I am
sure someone on the Perl group does.
of parsing in 17 seconds, even in Perl.
is still 5 seconds per message. Granted I don't know if that is a
steady influx or a deluge.
I'm doing email filtering on a number of servers with roughly the same
amount of traffic, and even on old systems (P3-class) this runs
quite smoothly, even though there's a number of scripts and
external programs involved which pipe the mail content back and
forth. If your co-workers are still worried (maybe they expect
traffic to grow fast) they could build a threaded solution, which
would rid them of the most expensive part, which will be loading
of configuration items and the compilation and startup of the
script itself.
-Chris
.
- References:
- A question of speed
- From: Robert Hicks
- Re: A question of speed
- From: anno4000
- Re: A question of speed
- From: Robert Hicks
- A question of speed
- Prev by Date: Re: How is this .cgi script achieved in Perl ??
- Next by Date: Re: test value
- Previous by thread: Re: A question of speed
- Next by thread: Re: A question of speed
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|