Re: DocumentHTML ?
- From: "A. Sinan Unur" <1usa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 03:15:02 GMT
"~greg" <g_m@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:ceidndaqk4ODRHnYnZ2dnUVZ_tqnnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx:
[ snip TOFU.
Please don't do that either.
]
--
Tad McClellan SGML consulting
tadmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Perl programming
Fort Worth, Texas
please don't spam.
Greg:
I don't know what to make of you. What is the point of that remark? Tad's
signature is just that: A standard sig which is separated from the body of
the post with the proper sequence of characters so that any reasonable
newsreader can automatically snip it in replies.
If you haven't read the posting guidelines yet, you should read them and
follow them so as to maximize the chances of getting useful responses.
Sinan
--
A. Sinan Unur <1usa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
(remove .invalid and reverse each component for email address)
comp.lang.perl.misc guidelines on the WWW:
http://augustmail.com/~tadmc/clpmisc/clpmisc_guidelines.html
.
- References:
- DocumentHTML ?
- From: ~greg
- Re: DocumentHTML ?
- From: A. Sinan Unur
- Re: DocumentHTML ?
- From: ~greg
- Re: DocumentHTML ?
- From: A. Sinan Unur
- Re: DocumentHTML ?
- From: ~greg
- Re: DocumentHTML ?
- From: Tad McClellan
- Re: DocumentHTML ?
- From: ~greg
- DocumentHTML ?
- Prev by Date: Re: new method to test Perl code
- Next by Date: Re: perl bug with references
- Previous by thread: Re: DocumentHTML ?
- Next by thread: Re: DocumentHTML ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|