Re: comp.lang.perl.cgi?



Charlton Wilbur wrote:
"GH" == Gunnar Hjalmarsson <noreply@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

GH> The group comp.infosystems.www.authoring.cgi has been down for
GH> several months. As far as I can understand, it means that
GH> there is no longer an appropriate Usenet group for those who
GH> use Perl for web applications to discuss CGI and HTTP matters.

On the contrary; it means that there is an appropriate Usenet group,
which nobody happens to be using.

No, the (moderated) group mentioned is out of order.

--
Gunnar Hjalmarsson
Email: http://www.gunnar.cc/cgi-bin/contact.pl
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: comp.lang.perl.cgi?
    ... it means that there is an appropriate Usenet group, ... The procedure for creating a new newsgroup is well-established and ... Have fun! ... Charlton Wilbur ...
    (comp.lang.perl.misc)
  • Re: cgi_bin
    ... Charlton Wilbur wrote: ... not justification for asking it here, ... Even if we don't know anything about the OPs ability in that respect, I'd say that the lack of a more appropriate Usenet group _does_ justify him asking it here. ... Gunnar Hjalmarsson ...
    (comp.lang.perl.misc)
  • Re: mod_perl, apache
    ... >> Not in a Usenet group for the Perl programming language. ... it's slightly related to perl modules. ... Gunnar Hjalmarsson ...
    (comp.lang.perl.misc)
  • Re: Opinions of RFC
    ... Nobody ... here cares if an unknown from another ng has bad things to say about ... I won't bother to figure out what uk usenet group you're posting from ...
    (rec.food.cooking)
  • Re: I did mean meg, sorry - mind is foggy lately
    ... giddyup wrote: ... Nobody is likely to know what you're talking about. ... usenet group, not a web forum. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)